Websites using Google Cloud Load Balancing
Google Cloud Load Balancing is a scalable, fully managed global load balancing service using Google Frontend.
85.3k live Google Cloud Load Balancing sites, ready to export.
That's how many Google Cloud Load Balancing websites are in VersionDB right now, each with its full tech stack, contact details, and social profiles.
Pick a ready-made template, or build your own filters in the Lead List Exporter and pay only for the rows you export.
Open the Lead List ExporterJust need a few domains? Export up to 10 free from a subset of our crawl.
Every Google Cloud Load Balancing website we detected in the United States.
Only sites where a personal, company-hosted email was found.
Sites with at least one personnel LinkedIn profile.
Start with the highest-traffic end of the dataset.
Limit results to Google Cloud Load Balancing websites on .com domains.
Only sites where an organisation phone number was found.
Websites Using Google Cloud Load Balancing
A sample of live Google Cloud Load Balancing sites from our latest crawl, with the other technologies each one runs.
| Domain | Also runs | Crawl Date |
|---|---|---|
| live4life.com | September 27, 2026 | |
| liceuoperaplus.com | September 27, 2026 | |
| lessonplanner.org | September 27, 2026 | |
| kg-m.jp | September 27, 2026 | |
| jswbuildsure.in | September 27, 2026 | |
| jellystonetyler.com | September 27, 2026 | |
| jellystonebartonlake.com | September 27, 2026 | |
| italianosencillo.com | September 27, 2026 | |
| irancho.app | September 27, 2026 | |
| institutojmuller.org | September 27, 2026 |
How many websites use Google Cloud Load Balancing?
We found Google Cloud Load Balancing on 85,327 websites in our September 2026 crawl, across 151 countries.
Which countries use Google Cloud Load Balancing the most?
By number of websites, the top countries are United States (64%, 54,555 sites), Japan (14%, 12,295 sites), Brazil (2%, 1,515 sites), United Kingdom (1%, 1,275 sites) and Germany (1%, 1,081 sites). Together they account for 83% of the 85,327 Google Cloud Load Balancing sites we track. 45% of the sites are in English, and .com is the most used domain ending, on 50% of them.
Where are Google Cloud Load Balancing websites hosted?
The networks carrying the most Google Cloud Load Balancing sites are Google LLC (78,155 sites), Fastly, Inc. (4,067 sites) and Amazon.com, Inc. (902 sites).
What technologies are used with Google Cloud Load Balancing?
Across the 85,327 Google Cloud Load Balancing sites we track, the technologies most often found alongside it are Google Cloud (100%, 85,327 sites), HTTP/3 (79%, 67,182 sites), Google Cloud CDN (61%, 51,890 sites), Google Cloud Trace (60%, 51,180 sites) and Node.js (59%, 50,127 sites).
Breakdown of Google Cloud Load Balancing websites
What else they run, plus their language, hosting network, domain extension and country.
| Technology | Sites |
|---|---|
|
Google Cloud | 85,327 |
HTTP/3 | 67,182 |
Google Cloud CDN | 51,890 |
Google Cloud Trace | 51,180 |
Node.js | 50,127 |
| HSTS | 30,811 |
Vue.js | 27,210 |
Nuxt.js | 26,623 |
Google Analytics | 13,474 |
React | 12,519 |
Express | 12,019 |
Webpack | 11,853 |
Next.js | 11,725 |
jQuery | 9,668 |
Google Tag Manager | 9,462 |
Bootstrap | 5,951 |
jsDelivr | 5,691 |
Cloudflare | 4,442 |
Firebase | 4,336 |
PHP | 4,111 |
cdnjs | 2,942 |
Google Hosted Libraries | 2,936 |
reCAPTCHA | 2,883 |
MySQL | 2,694 |
WordPress | 2,688 |
| Language | Sites |
|---|---|
| English | 38,719 |
| Japanese | 26,963 |
| Portuguese | 2,091 |
| German | 2,015 |
| Spanish | 2,013 |
| French | 1,578 |
| Chinese | 1,299 |
| Dutch | 790 |
| Latin | 712 |
| Italian | 708 |
| Swedish | 385 |
| Korean | 372 |
| Welsh | 342 |
| Tagalog | 330 |
| Norwegian Bokmål | 285 |
| Finnish | 273 |
| Polish | 262 |
| Danish | 248 |
| Czech | 210 |
| Turkish | 204 |
| Catalan | 175 |
| Romanian | 175 |
| Russian | 171 |
| Indonesian | 161 |
| Arabic | 160 |
| ASN | Sites |
|---|---|
| Google LLC | 78,155 |
| Fastly, Inc. | 4,067 |
| Amazon.com, Inc. | 902 |
| Cloudflare, Inc. | 644 |
| Xserver Inc. | 201 |
| Fly.io, Inc. | 139 |
| Cloudflare London, LLC | 129 |
| GMO Internet, Inc. | 83 |
| DigitalOcean, LLC | 75 |
| Hostinger International Limited | 72 |
| Hetzner Online GmbH | 63 |
| Akamai International B.V. | 55 |
| OVH SAS | 38 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 34 |
| Incapsula Inc | 32 |
| GoDaddy.com, LLC | 28 |
| SAKURA Internet Inc. | 25 |
| IONOS SE | 21 |
| IDC Frontier Inc. | 20 |
| Combell NV | 14 |
| The Constant Company, LLC | 14 |
| Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 12 |
| GMO GlobalSign Holdings K.K. | 11 |
| New Dream Network, LLC | 11 |
| Signet B.V. | 11 |
| TLD | Sites |
|---|---|
| com | 42,302 |
| jp | 11,880 |
| app | 3,132 |
| org | 2,324 |
| net | 2,051 |
| ai | 1,668 |
| br | 1,489 |
| io | 1,200 |
| uk | 1,184 |
| de | 836 |
| co | 792 |
| au | 680 |
| se | 557 |
| nl | 506 |
| ca | 490 |
| fr | 466 |
| it | 431 |
| info | 424 |
| at | 367 |
| ch | 367 |
| in | 338 |
| pt | 332 |
| tw | 330 |
| me | 316 |
| tv | 288 |
| Country | Sites |
|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 United States | 54,555 |
| 🇯🇵 Japan | 12,295 |
| Unknown | 3,181 |
| 🇧🇷 Brazil | 1,515 |
| 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | 1,275 |
| 🇩🇪 Germany | 1,081 |
| 🇦🇺 Australia | 711 |
| 🇧🇪 Belgium | 655 |
| 🇸🇪 Sweden | 573 |
| 🇨🇦 Canada | 569 |
| 🇳🇱 Netherlands | 567 |
| 🇫🇷 France | 557 |
| 🇪🇸 Spain | 536 |
| 🇮🇹 Italy | 527 |
| 🇮🇳 India | 483 |
| 🇨🇭 Switzerland | 401 |
| 🇦🇹 Austria | 387 |
| 🇵🇹 Portugal | 381 |
| 🇹🇼 Taiwan | 347 |
| 🇫🇮 Finland | 262 |
| 🇿🇦 South Africa | 238 |
| 🇳🇴 Norway | 236 |
| 🇮🇪 Ireland | 189 |
| 🇨🇿 Czech Republic | 187 |
| 🇨🇱 Chile | 185 |
Other technologies in Load balancers
Load balancers technologies run on 0.61% of the websites we track. Google Cloud Load Balancing ranks #2 of 5, on 27.66% of Load balancers sites.
Amazon ALB
166,372 sites, 53.93%
Azure Front Door
40,515 sites, 13.13%-
Amazon ELB
14,591 sites, 4.73%
Application Request Routing
3,881 sites, 1.26%
FAQ
Answers drawn from our latest crawl of Google Cloud Load Balancing websites. Anything else, email us and we will look it up.
Through our own crawl, which checks each site's HTML, scripts and headers rather than relying on self-reported data.