Zipkin icon

Websites using Zipkin

No description available

Lead List Exporter

7.3k live Zipkin sites, ready to export.

That's how many Zipkin websites are in VersionDB right now, each with its full tech stack, contact details, and social profiles.

Pick a ready-made template, or build your own filters in the Lead List Exporter and pay only for the rows you export.

Open the Lead List Exporter

Just need a few domains? Export up to 10 free from a subset of our crawl.

Start with a list template

Every Zipkin website we detected in Germany.

Only sites where a business, company-hosted email was found.

Sites with at least one business LinkedIn profile.

Start with the highest-traffic end of the dataset.

Limit results to Zipkin websites on .com domains.

Create your own

How many websites use Zipkin?

We found Zipkin on 7,310 websites in our September 2026 crawl, across 51 countries.

Which countries use Zipkin the most?

By number of websites, the top countries are Germany (69%, 5,044 sites), Netherlands (5%, 384 sites), Switzerland (5%, 349 sites), Australia (4%, 307 sites) and Spain (3%, 254 sites). Together they account for 87% of the 7,310 Zipkin sites we track. 65% of the sites are in German, and .de is the most used domain ending, on 47% of them.

Where are Zipkin websites hosted?

The networks carrying the most Zipkin sites are Strato GmbH (4,160 sites), IONOS SE (1,025 sites) and IPHH Internet Port Hamburg GmbH (537 sites).

What technologies are used with Zipkin?

Across the 7,310 Zipkin sites we track, the technologies most often found alongside it are ePages (87%, 6,351 sites), Apache HTTP Server (81%, 5,955 sites), Google Tag Manager (24%, 1,744 sites), HSTS (12%, 882 sites) and YouTube (7%, 547 sites).

Deep Dive

Breakdown of Zipkin websites

What else they run, plus their language, hosting network, domain extension and country.

FAQ

Answers drawn from our latest crawl of Zipkin websites. Anything else, email us and we will look it up.

Through our own crawl, which checks each site's HTML, scripts and headers rather than relying on self-reported data.